[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] charsets
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] charsets |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Feb 2013 13:16:25 -0500 |
>Actually, you don't need the *original* message for that, you need the
>*canonical* form that signatures are computed across. I'd have to check
>exactly what S/MIME wants, but for GPG, if you saved the "original" that has
>Q-P encoding, you have to un-Q-P it each time you want to verify the signature.
What I took away from our last conversation on this topic was that GPG
has a different canonical form than S/MIME. I personally view that as
another reason to store the original, but that's just me.
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] hardcoding en_US.UTF-8 in test cases, Oliver Kiddle, 2013/02/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] hardcoding en_US.UTF-8 in test cases, Ken Hornstein, 2013/02/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] hardcoding en_US.UTF-8 in test cases, Ken Hornstein, 2013/02/06
- [Nmh-workers] charsets, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/02/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] charsets, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/02/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] charsets,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] charsets, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/02/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] charsets, Oliver Kiddle, 2013/02/07
Re: [Nmh-workers] hardcoding en_US.UTF-8 in test cases, Oliver Kiddle, 2013/02/07
Re: [Nmh-workers] hardcoding en_US.UTF-8 in test cases, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/02/08