[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing
|
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing |
|
Date: |
Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:59:08 -0800 |
On 2013-01-07, at 4:56 PM, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Except don't put in the `= 0', it's needless noise akin to initialising
> something in BSS to 0 and makes the reader wonder the writer's intent.
The Plan 9 idiom is to include the '=0'. Redundant, but harmless.
- [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Paul Fox, 2013/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Paul Fox, 2013/01/09