nmh-workers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit


From: Ken Hornstein
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:12:09 -0500

>>Let's move to IETF termology and use -should and -must.  I'm sure others
>>will speak up, but MY understanding is the IETF default is "-should -must".
>
>Then perhaps -nomust is a synonym for -should and -noshould for -must?

Well, if you want precise definitions, here's the official text:

        http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119

Specifically:

1. MUST This word, or the terms "REQUIRED" or "SHALL", mean that the
   definition is an absolute requirement of the specification.

[...]

3. SHOULD This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there
   may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a
   particular item, but the full implications must be understood and
   carefully weighed before choosing a different course.

So, <998 columns is a MUST.  <=78 columns is a SHOULD.

--Ken



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]