|
From: | Jerrad Pierce |
Subject: | Re: [Nmh-workers] relative message numbers? |
Date: | Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:48:57 -0400 |
I don't really understand how relative numbers are useful, but if they are to be introduced why not use the same signifier as for folders? i.e; @ address@hidden = cur+2 address@hidden = cur-4 This could also prevent some confusion as to why we are using something with a clear meaning (+) for such an odd purpose...
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |