Re: [Nmh-workers] relative message numbers?

[Ralph Corderoy]

Hi Paul,

> jerrad wrote:
> > I don't really understand how relative numbers are useful, but if
> > they are to be introduced why not use the same signifier as for
> > folders?  i.e; @
> > 
> > address@hidden = cur+2  address@hidden = cur-4
...
> i'm also not sure how '@' relates to folders.

Perhaps Jerrad was referring to `@' being used instead of `+' for
relative folders.

    folder +inbox
    refile @example last    # Means +inbox/example.

Cheers, Ralph.