[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fun (was Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results)
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: fun (was Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results) |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:54:06 +0000 |
Hi Paul,
> ok so if there's no disk cache contention and the
> ~/Mail/inbox/mhindex.db file remains readable in disk cache, "scan"
> can finish in less than 1 second.
>
> [snip]
> 0.144u 0.227s 0:00.37 97.2% 147+1426k 0+1io 0pf+0w
> #nsa:amd64# wc -l /tmp/vix2
> 3293 /tmp/vix2
Nice to see some effort in this area. In future, could we have a
comparison with the stock scan run a few times too. IIRC, it only reads
in as many blocks of an email's file as required to get what it needs so
that might fit into RAM too.
I consider this AMD Athlon XP 1600+ old but get
$ \time scan +inbox first:3293 >$N
0.36user 0.15system 0:00.60elapsed 87%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+24outputs (0major+3791minor)pagefaults 0swaps
$ \time scan +inbox first:3293 >$N
0.33user 0.17system 0:00.60elapsed 84%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+16outputs (0major+3792minor)pagefaults 0swaps
$ \time scan +inbox first:3293 >$N
0.35user 0.16system 0:00.60elapsed 86%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+16outputs (0major+3789minor)pagefaults 0swaps
$
$ strace -e read scan +inbox first:3293 2>&1 >$N |
> awk '/^read/ {s += $NF} END {print s / 1024 / 1024}'
12.5713
$
Cheers,
Ralph.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Paul Vixie, 2011/02/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Paul Vixie, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Paul Vixie, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Ken Hornstein, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Paul Vixie, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Ken Hornstein, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Paul Vixie, 2011/02/15
fun (was Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results), Paul Vixie, 2011/02/07
- Re: fun (was Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results),
Ralph Corderoy <=