[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?
From: |
rader |
Subject: |
[Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs? |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 09:07:25 -0500 |
I'm hoping to run (exmh over) nmh over sshfs, but it doesn't work
because 1) sshfs doesn't implement link()...
bash$ df .
Filesystem GB-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
address@hidden 0.00 0.00 0.00
1000.00 0.00 1000.00 0% /home/rader/Mail
bash$ touch fu; perl -e "link('fu','bar')" ; ls -l bar
ls: bar: No such file or directory
...and 2) nmh scan (for example) "requires" that the underlying
filesystem implement link()...
bash$ strace scan
link("/home/rader/Mail/,LCK.OCkeZa", "/home/rader/Mail/context.lock") = -1
ENOSYS (Function not implemented)
unlink("/home/rader/Mail/,LCK.OCkeZa") = 0
stat64("/home/rader/Mail/context.lock", 0xbfe159b0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory)
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [CHLD], [], 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGCHLD, NULL, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
nanosleep({5, 0}, <unfinished ...>
Is there some workaround in nhm??
It's too bad "./configure --with-locking=dot" only applies to inc and msgchk.
steve
--
- [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?,
rader <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, Jerry Peek, 2008/10/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, rader, 2008/10/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, rader, 2008/10/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, Peter Maydell, 2008/10/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, rader, 2008/10/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, Jerry Peek, 2008/10/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, rader, 2008/10/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, rader, 2008/10/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, Robert Elz, 2008/10/20