[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?
From: |
rader |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs? |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 09:59:46 -0500 |
> > I'm hoping to run (exmh over) nmh over sshfs, but it doesn't work
> > because 1) sshfs doesn't implement link()...
> >
>
> When I ran Evolution a few years ago and told it about my MH message
> tree, it went through the tree and broke all of my message links.
> Because I like the ability to have a message appear in all of the
> folders where it might belong, I haven't used Evolution since. (I also
> filed a bug report, but I haven't checked whether anyone was able to fix
> it -- or did.)
>
> Still, for compatibility with non-*nix filesystems, would it makes sense
> for nmh to have a "no-links" configuration option? I haven't looked at
> the code to see how possible that might be... just an idea.
Interesting idea. A one line hack made scan and show work over sshfs,
so I might do the work.
Is there a regres/test suite/document for nmh???
steve
--
bash$ diff -u lock_file.c.orig lock_file.c
--- lock_file.c.orig 2008-04-05 13:41:37.000000000 -0500
+++ lock_file.c 2008-10-18 09:53:03.000000000 -0500
@@ -365,6 +365,9 @@
if ((fd = open (file, access, mode)) == -1)
return -1;
+/* SR HACK */
+return fd;
+
/*
* Get the name of the eventual lock file, as well
* as a name for a temporary lock file.
- [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, rader, 2008/10/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, Jerry Peek, 2008/10/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?,
rader <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, rader, 2008/10/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, Peter Maydell, 2008/10/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, rader, 2008/10/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, Jerry Peek, 2008/10/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, rader, 2008/10/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, rader, 2008/10/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, Robert Elz, 2008/10/20