[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal
From: |
Jerry Peek |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Jan 2006 04:50:40 -0700 |
Both sides -- whether an fcc copy should show the bcc recipients --
have good points. I hacked up a semi-ugly sendproc script for the
MH book, "mysend", that annotates an fcc copy with the list of bcc
recipients... but I'm *not* suggesting it as a solution.
I think this behavior should be configurable user-by-user. An MH
profile entry for "post:" (which, if I remember right, is what
writes the actual fccs?) might be a good place.
Jerry
--
Jerry Peek, address@hidden, http://www.jpeek.com/
- [Nmh-workers] new stuff for 2.0 (FCC behavior for BCC proposal), bergman, 2006/01/03
- [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Bill Wohler, 2006/01/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal,
Jerry Peek <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, bergman, 2006/01/04
- [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Bill Wohler, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Nathan Bailey, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Chad Walstrom, 2006/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Tethys, 2006/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Chad Walstrom, 2006/01/08