[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nmh-workers] new stuff for 2.0 (FCC behavior for BCC proposal)
From: |
bergman |
Subject: |
[Nmh-workers] new stuff for 2.0 (FCC behavior for BCC proposal) |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Jan 2006 12:42:15 -0500 |
Here's a minor change that I'd like to propose to nmh:
The "Fcc" copy of a Bcc message should contain the actual
recipients list of the original message, not the text
"Blind Distribution List: ;"
As the sender, there's no need to supress the list of recipients (in fact, it
makes the Fcc copy almost useless).
Mark
-----
Mark Bergman Biker, Rock Climber, Unix mechanic, IATSE #1 Stagehand
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=bergman%40merctech.com
I want a newsgroup with a infinite S/N ratio! Now taking CFV on:
rec.motorcycles.stagehands.pet-bird-owners.pinballers.unix-supporters
15+ So Far--Want to join? Check out: http://www.panix.com/~bergman
- [Nmh-workers] new stuff for 2.0 (FCC behavior for BCC proposal),
bergman <=
- [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Bill Wohler, 2006/01/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, bergman, 2006/01/04
- [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Bill Wohler, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Nathan Bailey, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Chad Walstrom, 2006/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Tethys, 2006/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Chad Walstrom, 2006/01/08