[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3

From: Ken Hornstein
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] RC3
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:29:40 -0500

>On my system, the headers were all installed in $(prefix)/include/sasl
>The headers for 1.5 were installed in $(prefix)/include

I guess it's a choice you can make at configure time for SASL.

>That's probably a mistake.  The "#include" statements should be
>specify "<sasl/sasl.h>".  It is usually bad practice to list a
>subdirectory of "/usr/include" in a "-I" directive.

Hm.  I see some SASL 2 programs that do #include <sasl.h>, and some
that do #include <sasl/sasl.h>.

Well, how about we fix this in the next release?  I'm willing to live
with a less than elegant fix for this release.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]