[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] RFC: nano's justifications are poorer than those of Pic
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] RFC: nano's justifications are poorer than those of Pico -- okay to improve? |
Date: |
Mon, 21 May 2018 10:34:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 |
Op 20-05-18 om 21:36 schreef Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita:
> I'm not a big user of text justification and I am biased to external
> commands, so take my opinion with care. Can't we just "delegate" this
> task to par or gnu fmt?
No. I don't want any extra dependencies. We depend on ncurses, and
have optional dependencies on spell and libmagic -- I don't want to
depend on anything else. Plus: running the stuff through an external
helper is way to inefficient.
Benno
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature