Re: [Nano-devel] RFC: nano's justifications are poorer than those of Pico -- okay to improve?

[David Ramsey]

Benno Schulenberg:
> Yes, I cut some corners in the descriptions.  :) But meanwhile I've
> come up with a more concise way: using recursion.  See the second of
> the upcoming pair of patches.

Sounds good.

> In the "pathological" case of a file where no two adjacent lines have
> the same indentation, this recursion could go back all the way to the
> start of the file.  Do you think we should cut that short somehow, to
> prevent a stack overflow?

I'm not sure.  I'll look at it.  It'll be a few days, though; I'll be
busy this week, until Friday at least.