[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nano-devel] RFC: should nano respond to a SIGCONT?

From: Benno Schulenberg
Subject: Re: [Nano-devel] RFC: should nano respond to a SIGCONT?
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 12:48:49 +0200

On Thu, May 25, 2017, at 12:05, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> So in effect it should ignore any SIGCONT that doesn't come
> from the fg command.  Which is what the attached patch does.

The body of do_continue() was just for testing purposes.
Attached is a version of the patch that will make nano
recompute also the size of the edit window.


-- - Access your email from home and the web

Attachment: handle-sigcont-as-sigwinch.patch
Description: Text Data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]