[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nano-devel] RFC: should nano respond to a SIGCONT?

From: David Ramsey
Subject: Re: [Nano-devel] RFC: should nano respond to a SIGCONT?
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 16:43:13 -0500

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Benno Schulenberg
<address@hidden> wrote:
> This doesn't actually do anything, because apparently ttyname is never
> NULL.  Putting in some more print statements, it results that after
> receiving a SIGCONT during suspension, nano goes back to sleep in
> endwin().  It seems that endwin() contains code that checks whether
> stdin is connected to anything.
> See attached patch for another try.

Also seems to work well.

> This trick won't work under Slang, but there are already several
> things that don't work right with Slang.  Support for Slang is really
> only being kept for Jordi, who needs it for tiny nano.

And there are only so many ways to work around the problems in slang's
curses emulation, unfortunately.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]