[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nano-devel] Recent nanomiscbugs2.patch changes

From: David Lawrence Ramsey
Subject: Re: [Nano-devel] Recent nanomiscbugs2.patch changes
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:11:55 -0700 (PDT)

Good catch.  Fixed now in nanomiscbugs2.patch.

Sluggy.Net: The Sluggy Freelance Community!

Select your own custom email address for FREE! Get address@hidden w/No Ads, 
6MB, POP & more!
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [Nano-devel] Recent nanomiscbugs2.patch changes Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:10:40 -0400 User-agent: Mutt/
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 04:10:46PM -0700, David Lawrence Ramsey wrote:
> The tweaks are in nanomiscbugs2.patch, along with ... a port of DB's
> getopt() cleanup (don't check for h or ?, just let them fall through to
> default:, which will call usage() and exit, which is what we want to do
> in those cases anyway).

Ack!  I was wrong, getopt() needs h and ?.  Otherwise, "nano -?" gives an
error message

nano: invalid option -- ?

followed by the Usage information.  The patches at have been updated to leave the option
string alone.  (They will be synced with CVS shortly.)

Attachment: pgp755RQ7VyIQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]