[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1
From: |
Zack Weinberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1 |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Jan 2011 11:19:09 -0800 |
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Richard Levitte <address@hidden> wrote:
> In message <address@hidden> on Wed, 5 Jan 2011 08:43:38 -0800, Zack Weinberg
> <address@hidden> said:
>
> zackw> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Markus Wanner <address@hidden> wrote:
> zackw> > Zack,
> zackw> >
> zackw> > Can you elaborate on what's wrong with that? libbotan1.7-dev
> correctly
> zackw> > depends on libssl0.9.8, which provides libcrypto.so.0.9.8.
> zackw> >
> zackw> > And yes, linking that with -lcrypto works without the symlink
> zackw> > libcrypto.so -> libcrypto.so.0.9.8. (Symlink only provided by
> libssl-dev)
> zackw>
> zackw> Are you 100% sure that you can link a *program* with -lcrypto without
> zackw> that symlink existing?
>
> Nope.
[demo snipped]
Exactly. So either botan-config shouldn't be adding -lcrypto to the
link line, or libbotan1.7-dev needs to depend on libssl-dev. Either
way, that's a bug in the botan packaging.
zw
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Thomas Keller, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1,
Zack Weinberg <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/20