[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1
From: |
Zack Weinberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1 |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Jan 2011 20:48:13 -0800 |
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Richard Levitte <address@hidden> wrote:
> In message <address@hidden> on Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:28:56 -0800, Zack Weinberg
> <address@hidden> said:
>
> zackw> Is libssl-dev installed? Does the botan-dev package (whatever it's
> zackw> actually named) depend on libssl-dev, as it seems it needs to?
>
> Why should libbotan1.7-dev need to depend on libssl-dev?
It's botan-config that adds -lcrypto to the link line, so it's
libbotan1.7-dev's responsibility to ensure that the bare
"libcrypto.so" symlink exists, which would be accomplished by
depending on libssl-dev.
(I'm a little surprised this is the case, I thought botan had its own
crypto primitives and that the weird libssl license precluded its
using ssl's)
zw
- [Monotone-devel] minor documentation bug in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Thomas Keller, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1,
Zack Weinberg <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Thomas Keller, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03