[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Maposmatic-dev] [PATCH ocitysmap] Add "public_building" into street
From: |
Thomas Petazzoni |
Subject: |
Re: [Maposmatic-dev] [PATCH ocitysmap] Add "public_building" into street index amenities (task 10049) |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:08:28 +0100 |
Hello,
Le Wed, 6 Jan 2010 18:32:37 +0100,
David MENTRE <address@hidden> a écrit :
> diff --git a/ocitysmap/street_index.py b/ocitysmap/street_index.py
> index 15f079f..4aa642f 100644
> --- a/ocitysmap/street_index.py
> +++ b/ocitysmap/street_index.py
> @@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ class OCitySMap:
> (_(u"Education"), "library", _(u"Library")),
> (_(u"Public buildings"), "townhall", _(u"Town hall")),
> (_(u"Public buildings"), "post_office", _(u"Post
> office")),
> + (_(u"Public buildings"), "public_building", _(u"Public
> buildings")), (_(u"Public buildings"), "police", _(u"Police"))]
>
> datasource = dict(self.parser.items('datasource'))
What type of buildings are marked simply public_building ?
In addition, the third item of each tuple is the name that will be
displayed in the index if the name tag of the location is empty.
Therefore, it should not be a plural form. I.e, _(u"Public building")
instead of _(u"Public buildings"). But as "Public building" is
completely useless as an information, I'm wondering whether we should
completely discard amenity=public_building entries when name is empty.
What do you think ?
Regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni http://thomas.enix.org
Promouvoir et défendre le Logiciel Libre http://www.april.org
Logiciels Libres à Toulouse http://www.toulibre.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature