[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] glibc-detected "double free or corruption bug" in lynx (2
From: |
dREPLACEeLETTEReEjBYeLETTEReAatGMA ILcom |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] glibc-detected "double free or corruption bug" in lynx (2.8.8dev.14) |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:39:09 +0100 |
I will not release the full Lynx Trace file as it cannot be anonymized
and reveal too much about me and my habits. But I will still look
inside for keywords like "Error" or "TODO" inside it.
Is there any other keyword of interest to track in the full Lynx Trace file ?
> I'd add the "--enable-debug" option to the configure options.
> [...]
> I use valgrind on various programs using a script like this:
> [...]
Thank you very much. I will setup this in the near future.
> gdb /usr/bin/lynx core
> bt
> ...shows the traceback
> quit
> That would be "dev", not "pre":
>
> 2012-11-18 (2.8.8dev.15)
> 2012-08-22 (2.8.8dev.14)
> [...]
Gentoo Linux does not handle _dev versions :-(
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/file-format/index.html
Some maintainer replaced _dev by _pre, back in 2009, he should have
better taken _alpha (or _beta), now it is too late.
The version you plan to name 2.8.8pre.1 cannot be called 2.8.8_pre1 in
Gentoo Linux (because is would be marked older than 2.8.8_pre15).
Do you mind if I ask gentoo to call 2.8.8_rc_beta16 and 2.8.8_rc_pre1
the versions that you plan to name 2.8.8dev.16 and 2.8.8pre.1 ? They
would be marked newer than 2.8.8_pre15, and future version 2.8.8 will
be marked older than 2.8.8_rc_pre1.
Thank you again for your commitment !
noname
Description: Text document