Re: ALLOC_IN_POOL, Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.11

[Leonid Pauzner]

3-Dec-2002 14:29 I wrote:
> 2-Dec-2002 00:24 Bela Lubkin wrote:

>>   http://www.armory.com/cache/userinfo-t.html

>> performance of an old Lynx 2.8.4dev.20 binary vs. today's 2.8.5dev.11.
>> I also compared output, verifying that they were in fact identical.

>> The results show that Leonid grossly underestimated the benefits of his
>> changes:

>>    File                   2.8.4dev.20     2.8.5dev.11
>>                                 -dump            -dump
>>                          -dump  -nolist   -dump  -nolist
>>   userinfo450.html        0.10   0.08      0.08   0.06
>>   userinfo450-t.html      0.10   0.11      0.09   0.10
>>   userinfo3600.html       4.95   2.50      0.48   0.42
>>   userinfo3600-t.html     5.30   4.56      0.54   2.50
>>   userinfo7200.html      28.24  10.54      0.93   0.83
>>   userinfo7200-t.html    27.93  20.25      1.08  10.29

>> Oddly, `lynx -dump -nolist` is now slower than `lynx -dump` in some
>> cases...

> Still cannot figure why -nolist is slower, but you help me fix
> one more quadratic behaviour issue:
> userinfoNNN-t.html is a huge table with lots of anchors.
...
Apparently, lynx with -nolist option on the above test file
shows STbl (visualy improved simple tables) which eats CPU,
while without the flag tables are collapsed for some reason -
try "links are numbered" in the Options menu for such presentation.
Not sure whether this is a bug or just the table happens to be too wide
in this case.

Leonid.


; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden