[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8
From: |
Thomas E. Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8 |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Aug 2000 16:24:02 -0400 (EDT) |
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000 address@hidden wrote:
> In a recent note, Thomas E. Dickey said:
>
> > Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 15:57:47 -0400 (EDT)
> >
> > I was thinking in terms of number of files changed (dev.8 is medium
> > on that scale - discounting the configure script that's only 800 lines
> > add+delete, 37 files changed). Most of the files touched were for
> > wrapping the fclose's. dev.5 (which changes a lot more lines) still
> > only touches 54 files.
> >
> Oh, I understand. You meant the size of your patch rather than
> the size of my segment in it.
yes - that's the part that takes the most thought. (Checking and
making fixes to other people's patches doesn't take a lot of
concentration, since most of the problems are small/localized: fix
compiler warnings, misspellings, whitespace, try to run simple tests
that exercise the new functions, and test-build on platforms to check
portability).
> -- gil
>
--
T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, Thomas Dickey, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, pg, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, Thomas E. Dickey, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, pg, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, Thomas E. Dickey, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, pg, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, Thomas E. Dickey, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, pg, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8,
Thomas E. Dickey <=