[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev JS onclick
From: |
mattack |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev JS onclick |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 18:27:21 -0700 (PDT) |
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Natasha Live wrote:
>Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 02:19:49 +0100
>From: Natasha Live <address@hidden>
>Reply-To: address@hidden
>To: address@hidden
>Subject: Re: lynx-dev JS onclick
>
>I guess we can only hope that the advent of the digital services (in the
>UK anyway), will lower the browsing specs required.
>
>The internet browsers included in Sky/Cable/OnDigital digital services are
>not up to the task of displaying flash and similar "high level" html. In fact
>the new BUSH internet TV set (internet browser built into the actual tv) states
>that quote "..it does NOT have the full range of capabilities that you would
> expect from an expensive PC. The system may not allow access to certain
>internet banking services and areas using complex graphics or developed in
>'flash' programme language. It will not produce moving pictures or reproduce
>sounds from the web sites.". Whilst this doesn't affect Lynx as such, i can't
This sounds like it _might_ have lower capabilities than WebTV.
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick (was still learning), Henry Nelson, 2000/07/30
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, Philip Webb, 2000/07/30
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, David Woolley, 2000/07/30
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, pAb-032871, 2000/07/30
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, Philip Webb, 2000/07/31
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, A. R. Vener, 2000/07/31
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, Patrick Boylan, 2000/07/31
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, Natasha Live, 2000/07/31
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick,
mattack <=
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, Patrick, 2000/07/31
Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, A. R. Vener, 2000/07/30