[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev JS onclick
From: |
pAb-032871 |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev JS onclick |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Jul 2000 01:49:47 -0700 |
In "Re: lynx-dev JS onclick"
[30/Jul/2000 Sun 00:23:55]
David Woolley wrote:
> > it really shouldn't be difficult to get Lynx to recognise `onclick',
> > extract the following URL & present it as a link marked `ONCLICK':
>
> In many, if not most, of the cases I've seen, the URL is not in the
> onclick parameter. What is there is either an index number, or only
> part of the relative URL; most commonly just an index number.
Yes, a lot of JavaScript'ed links call URLs which are actually
between the <SCRIPT> elements [well, not URLs exactly, but relative
paths]. Converting the link itself would be tricky, but could
Lynx instead look into the script for references and convert these
to links? They would generally appear at the top of the page,
since most scripts are in the <HEAD>.
For example, New Array() variables almost always point to other
documents [often, these would waste time on image rollover references,
but it would pull a lot of useful URLs from scripts too]. Could
it handle/generate these links the same way it does with image
maps?
Patrick
<mailto:address@hidden>
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick (was still learning), Henry Nelson, 2000/07/30
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, Philip Webb, 2000/07/30
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, David Woolley, 2000/07/30
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick,
pAb-032871 <=
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, Philip Webb, 2000/07/31
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, A. R. Vener, 2000/07/31
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, Patrick Boylan, 2000/07/31
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, Natasha Live, 2000/07/31
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, mattack, 2000/07/31
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, Patrick, 2000/07/31
Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, A. R. Vener, 2000/07/30