[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainstream?
From: |
David Combs |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainstream? |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Jun 2000 15:56:21 -0700 |
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 08:14:00PM +0100, David Woolley wrote:
> > I thought Lynx was purely open-sourced FreeWare. In this case,
> > is it commercial, patented code which allows special exceptions
> > for NON-commercial use? The Lesser GPL?
>
> Lynx is full GPL. SSL Lynx is non-commercial use only in the USA,
snip
"Lesser" gpl? Is that the "LGPL"?
Please, what IS the LGPL?
Is COMMERCIAL software allowed to include something that's
under an LGPL license?
Also -- what are the OTHER licenses for freeware -- that do
NOT restrict commercial software from using?
Thanks
David
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainstream?, Duncan Simpson, 2000/06/02
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainstream?, David Woolley, 2000/06/04
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainstream?, pAb-032871, 2000/06/04
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainstream?, David Woolley, 2000/06/05
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainstream?, Duncan Simpson, 2000/06/05
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainstream?, David Woolley, 2000/06/07
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainstream?, Philip Webb, 2000/06/07
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainstream?, David Woolley, 2000/06/08
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainstream?,
David Combs <=
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainstream?, Chuck Martin, 2000/06/07
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainstream?, pAb-032871, 2000/06/07
- Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainstream?, David Woolley, 2000/06/07
Re: lynx-dev Could SSL (moudlo Open=SSL) become mainstream?, David Woolley, 2000/06/04