[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev [yet another] note on table rendering
From: |
Chuck Martin |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev [yet another] note on table rendering |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Apr 2000 18:25:47 -0400 |
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 09:12:31AM -0500, Klaus Weide wrote:
>
> Lynx's Minimal Table Support = treat <TD> as ' ', treat <TR> as <BR>
> (more or less). That's in general (for "real" tables) much better than
> your minimal proposal.
I would think it would be better to treat <TD> as at least two spaces
(non-collapsible), since there might be several words in each table cell,
and this would make it more clear where the boundaries were. Maybe even
something like '::' would be better, in case some or all of the table
cells begin or end with a <BR>.
> When tables are used just for positioning and layout, I generally don't
> miss seeing them. Mostly only if some text mentions something silly like
> "click the blahblah icon to the left" etc.
I agree, and I'd rather lynx would only render real tables, since tables
generally slow things down more than you might realize (I did a comparison
between lynx, links, and w3m on a local copy of a large document that used
tables for formatting, and the times were about 7 seconds for lynx, 21 for
w3m, and 35 for links, if I remember correctly, although there could have
been other reasons besides the tables, since I didn't try to duplicate the
experiment with a large document without tables). The problem is trying
to get lynx to know which are real tables and which are just table abuses
for formatting purposes.
Chuck