[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev MacLynx Update...? [was: Newbie Question]
From: |
mattack |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev MacLynx Update...? [was: Newbie Question] |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Apr 2000 14:55:39 -0700 (PDT) |
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, pAb-032871 wrote:
>> topics which keep coming up are tables & Javascript,
>> mainly because no-one has found time & will-power to tackle them.
>
>Personally, I don't see much point in supporting JavaScript, but then
>again, one of my favourite things ABOUT Lynx is that it's stripped:
>lean, fast, basic, and brutal, with no unneccesary features and and
>absolutely NO window-dressing. Next to Mozilla, compare a bus to an
>offroad motorcyle. Some sites are innaccessible without JS support, but
>most authors use <NOSCRIPT> wisely.
*Many* sites are inaccessible without JS support, or are just *barely*
usable without it. I'd personally put JavaScript support AHEAD of
better table support (though I realize that better table support is probably
needed to properly implement JavaScript).
real world/commercial sites that I want to use with Lynx.