[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION
From: |
Larry W. Virden |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Jan 2000 07:29:56 -0500 (EST) |
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 06:19:47PM -0600, Klaus Weide wrote:
> 'D'ownload means "download", period. It's always meant that.
> The user can expect that a new download attempt will be made,
> rather than just using a (possibly corrupt) cached copy.
Assuming that lynx continues in this fashion - where download _means_ download -
will the downloaded version replace the cached version as well? That way,
the possibly corrupt cached copy gets refreshed...
--
Larry W. Virden <mailto:address@hidden><http://www.usenix.org/events/tcl2k/>
<URL: http://www.purl.org/NET/lvirden/> <*> O-
Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should
be construed as representing my employer's opinions.
-><-
- Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION, David Woolley, 2000/01/02
- Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION, pg, 2000/01/03
- Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION, Klaus Weide, 2000/01/03
- Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION, pg, 2000/01/03
- Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION, Klaus Weide, 2000/01/03
- Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION, Philip Webb, 2000/01/04
- lynx-dev about downloading and source cache (was: THANKS AND QUESTION), Klaus Weide, 2000/01/04
- Re: lynx-dev about downloading and source cache (was: THANKS AND QUESTION), Vlad Harchev, 2000/01/04
Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION, T.E.Dickey, 2000/01/03
Re: lynx-dev THANKS AND QUESTION,
Larry W. Virden <=