[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx: questions and suggestions
From: |
Leonid Pauzner |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx: questions and suggestions |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Mar 1999 00:05:06 +0400 (MSD) |
29-Mar-99 07:57 address@hidden wrote:
>> *Lynx thoroughly registers functions (via atexit) that will free up
>> allocated
>> memory chunks. IMO it's not necessary at least on "normal" systems -
>> allocated
> that's only used for memory-leak checking, should be ifdef'd as such.
At least #ifdef atexit(free_all_texts) which is the main load.
BTW, this will hide some memory problems, not only leaks
as we see from Larry's report.
>> memory is always reclaimed at the program exit. Not registering functions
>> that
>> clear allocated space possibly will yield performance increase since
>> (as I understand) it let libc routines to clear the memory in the way it
>> thinks optimal (in the order the chunks are in the memory manager lists).
>> IMO it's safe to make such optimization for all Unixes and possibly
>> Windows. Am I right ? Please correct this list of OSes if something wrong.
- lynx-dev lynx: questions and suggestions, Vlad Harchev, 1999/03/29
- Re: lynx-dev lynx: questions and suggestions, Philip Webb, 1999/03/29
- Re: lynx-dev lynx: questions and suggestions, Webmaster Jim, 1999/03/29
- Re: lynx-dev lynx: questions and suggestions, Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/29
- Re: lynx-dev lynx: questions and suggestions, David Combs, 1999/03/29
- Re: lynx-dev lynx: questions and suggestions, Vlad Harchev, 1999/03/30
- Re: lynx-dev lynx: questions and suggestions, dickey, 1999/03/29
- Re: lynx-dev lynx: questions and suggestions, Larry W. Virden, 1999/03/29
- Re: lynx-dev lynx: questions and suggestions, Larry W. Virden, 1999/03/29
- Re: lynx-dev lynx: questions and suggestions, Larry W. Virden, 1999/03/29
- Re: lynx-dev lynx: questions and suggestions, dickey, 1999/03/29