[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.20
From: |
Kim DeVaughn |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.20 |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Mar 1999 09:43:56 -0800 |
On Thu, Mar 18, 1999, address@hidden (address@hidden) said:
|
| > Probably a better wording: "(default: enabled)" ?
|
| it'll be hard(er) to fit into 80 columns.
Perhaps just mentioning that the (default: value) refers to the option
*itself*, rather that the state of the --switch would eliminate the
confusion (which I too have to doublethink about, when a new option/
switch gets added).
/kim
- lynx-dev [dev.20] missing patchlet (was: lynx2.8.2dev.20), (continued)
- lynx-dev [dev.20] missing patchlet (was: lynx2.8.2dev.20), Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/18
- lynx-dev Re: dev20 (with patch to patch that makes patches :-), pg, 1999/03/18
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.20, dickey, 1999/03/18
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.20, Larry W. Virden, 1999/03/18
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.20, dickey, 1999/03/18
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.20, dickey, 1999/03/18