[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Re: looking for space for lynx distribution
From: |
dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Re: looking for space for lynx distribution |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Jan 1999 16:25:50 -0500 (EST) |
> Maybe true, but not "nice" response to a very valid concern.
>
> I hope that the "don't recommend (or even mention?) non-free doc"
> isn't part of the LEGAL statement.
if it were, it would be sufficient grounds for ignoring the whole affair.
> Hopefully, is just rms' hope and desire for the way things
> actually work out.
>
> Once it becomes LEGALLY part of gnu-thingie, maybe gnu/fsf
if (I'm not inclined to move in that direction either - status quo is fine)
> will be in trouble from LOTS of software maintainers, not just
> lynx. Maybe then he'll soften his position.
>
> Even the republicans in the senate are raising trial baloons
> on stopping this impeachment thing -- they are getting feedback
> from the voters!
>
> David
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Re: looking for space for lynx distribution, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev Re: looking for space for lynx distribution, Bela Lubkin, 1999/01/22
- Re: lynx-dev Re: looking for space for lynx distribution, Henry Nelson, 1999/01/22
- Re: lynx-dev Re: looking for space for lynx distribution, Henry Nelson, 1999/01/22
- Re: lynx-dev Re: looking for space for lynx distribution, David Combs, 1999/01/23
- Re: lynx-dev Re: looking for space for lynx distribution,
dickey <=
- Re: lynx-dev Re: looking for space for lynx distribution, dickey, 1999/01/25
- Re: lynx-dev Re: looking for space for lynx distribution, Bela Lubkin, 1999/01/26