[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Re: looking for space for lynx distribution
From: |
Henry Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Re: looking for space for lynx distribution |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Jan 1999 11:58:06 +0900 (JST) |
> According to this `rule', you could not even refer to a commercial
> Unix man page describing that system's own internal idiosyncracies.
> RMS isn't just trying to provide free software, he's actively trying
> to kill all commercial software entities. (I work for one, so yes, I'm
> biased, but I don't think I'm unreasonable.)
You are not unreasonable. I understand and will stand behind your
position should the discussion on lynx-dev turn to what I feel is
an undesirable direction. I already walk a very tight wire at the
university here. I'd rather see the freeness of Lynx continue as it is
rather than fettering it more than it already is to GNU. To be perfectly
frank, the whole use of the gettext() function as it is presently
implemented makes me a bit queasy.
__Henry
Re: lynx-dev Re: looking for space for lynx distribution, Bela Lubkin, 1999/01/22
Re: lynx-dev Re: looking for space for lynx distribution,
Henry Nelson <=
Re: lynx-dev Re: looking for space for lynx distribution, Henry Nelson, 1999/01/22
Re: lynx-dev Re: looking for space for lynx distribution, David Combs, 1999/01/23
Re: lynx-dev Re: looking for space for lynx distribution, dickey, 1999/01/23
Re: lynx-dev Re: looking for space for lynx distribution, dickey, 1999/01/25