Re: lynx-dev 2.8.1dev.19.patch.gz

[Bela Lubkin]

Rob Partington wrote:

> > Actually, after playing some more with it, I'm really not sure what's
> > wrong.  :-(  Exactly what is LYstrsep() supposed to be doing when its
> > second argument isn't found -- what's it supposed to return, is it
> > supposed to have done anything to the pointed-to data, and is it
> > supposed to have done anything to its first argument?
> 
> Changing the patch to set `out' to be NULL in the initialiser might
> help - that way, strsep will return NULL if strpbrk returns NULL,
> rather than some undefined value.

The code in dev.19 already has "char *out = 0;".  That's not it.

Someone mail me a strsep() man page from a system that has it?

>Bela<