[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
lynx-dev improving documentation
From: |
Philip Webb |
Subject: |
lynx-dev improving documentation |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Aug 1998 20:29:30 -0400 (EDT) |
980803 Al Gilman wrote:
> If it is intended as changes to the content of a distribution,
> it should be in a format someone actively changing the file set
> that patch-o-matic runs from finds convenient to work with.
> Don't say "it won't be a patch". Ask "what are acceptable patch formats?"
well, it seems to me that after enough time
your old coat is so worn you have to go out & get a new one:
if the patch > 50 % the original, it's best to submit a whole new file.
perhaps you have greater respect for our forefathers than i have ...
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
lynx-dev improving documentation,
Philip Webb <=
Re: lynx-dev improving documentation, T.E.Dickey, 1998/08/03
Re: lynx-dev improving documentation, T.E.Dickey, 1998/08/04
Re: lynx-dev improving documentation, T.E.Dickey, 1998/08/04