Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Lynx question: frames and <object>

[Matt Ackeret]

On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Al Gilman wrote:
>Lynx displays both the frames as links and the contents of the
><NOFRAMES> section.  Given that competently done <NOFRAMES> 
>sections are in the minority, and not syntactically verifiable
>to be such, it is probably best that Lynx continue to do this.

So this is why we get _usable_ frames sites(*) and "you need a frames capable
browser to use this site" messages all of the time?

I think the <NOFRAMES> stuff should not be shown, since Lynx does support
frames, sort of.

(*) Well, you're basically "going into" each frame one by one, but it
still works on a lot of sites.