Re: LYNX-DEV VU#5135 (Lynx vulnerability?) (fwd)

[T.E.Dickey]

> 
> >-- A better solution (which I'll keep in mind for _after_ merging) is using
> >   a wrapper for fopen (i.e., open/fdopen) that'll allow the proper
> >   semantics.
> 
> Is it not safe enough to just provide the permission mode as the 3rd argument
> to open?
not all systems have a 3-argument 'open()'.

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE:  Send a mail message to address@hidden
;                  with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
;                  quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;