[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV VU#5135 (Lynx vulnerability?) (fwd)
From: |
Larry W. Virden, x2487 |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV VU#5135 (Lynx vulnerability?) (fwd) |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Jun 1997 09:00:16 -0400 |
>-- A better solution (which I'll keep in mind for _after_ merging) is using
> a wrapper for fopen (i.e., open/fdopen) that'll allow the proper
> semantics.
Is it not safe enough to just provide the permission mode as the 3rd argument
to open?
--
Larry W. Virden INET: address@hidden
<URL:http://www.teraform.com/%7Elvirden/> <*> O- "We are all Kosh."
Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should
be construed as representing my employer's opinions.
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- Re: LYNX-DEV VU#5135 (Lynx vulnerability?) (fwd), (continued)
- Re: LYNX-DEV VU#5135 (Lynx vulnerability?) (fwd), Jan Hlavacek, 1997/06/24
- Re: LYNX-DEV VU#5135 (Lynx vulnerability?) (fwd), H E Nelson, 1997/06/24
- Re: LYNX-DEV VU#5135 (Lynx vulnerability?) (fwd), Foteos Macrides, 1997/06/24
- Re: LYNX-DEV VU#5135 (Lynx vulnerability?) (fwd), Alex Lyons A32/373-Winfrith Tel2368 FAX2508, 1997/06/25
- Re: LYNX-DEV VU#5135 (Lynx vulnerability?) (fwd), Alex Lyons A32/373-Winfrith Tel2368 FAX2508, 1997/06/25
- Re: LYNX-DEV VU#5135 (Lynx vulnerability?) (fwd), Bela Lubkin, 1997/06/26
- Re: LYNX-DEV VU#5135 (Lynx vulnerability?) (fwd), Foteos Macrides, 1997/06/27