[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV ALIGNment problem
From: |
Foteos Macrides |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV ALIGNment problem |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Dec 1996 18:41:07 -0500 (EST) |
"Christopher R. Maden" <address@hidden> wrote:
>[Foteos Macrides]
>
>> I like that behavior because it allows you to vary whether the
>> rule will be flush versus separated from the preceding text (whereas
>> the text that follows will always be separated from the rule).
>
>Whoop! Whoop! Thought Police!
>
>This is dangerous thinking - probably subconciously and
>unintentionally, you are relying on Lynx's error recovery behavior to
>produce a presentational effect. This is no different than relying on
>Netscape's interpretation of <i>italic <b>bold italic</i> bold</b>.
Whoop! Whoop! Expression Police!
If Fote tells you that Lynx does such and such because he likes that
behavior, you're revealing extreme naivete to think it's unintentional,
and for someone who has been on this list as long as you, Chris, perhaps
worse than just naivete. :) :) :)
Fote
=========================================================================
Foteos Macrides Worcester Foundation for Biomedical Research
address@hidden 222 Maple Avenue, Shrewsbury, MA 01545
=========================================================================
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- Re: LYNX-DEV ALIGNment problem, (continued)
Re: LYNX-DEV ALIGNment problem, Foteos Macrides, 1996/12/13
Re: LYNX-DEV ALIGNment problem, Foteos Macrides, 1996/12/13
Re: LYNX-DEV ALIGNment problem, Foteos Macrides, 1996/12/13
Re: LYNX-DEV ALIGNment problem,
Foteos Macrides <=