[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving
From: |
K.J. Mansley |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving |
Date: |
27 Oct 2004 08:49:05 +0100 |
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 08:32, Sigurd Vindenes wrote:
> Our solution was to prioritize the API_MSG_RECV messages above all other
> messages to the TCP thread. This can be accomplished by a send to front of
> queue call if your mailbox interface supports this, or, as in our case by
> implementing a priority queue based on a standard queue interface.
Sounds interesting. Do you have any patches that could be contributed
back into the stack?
Thanks
Kieran
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Atte Kojo, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Wei Bo-Er \(Jason\), 2004/10/12
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Craig Graham, 2004/10/12
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Atte Kojo, 2004/10/12
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Craig Graham, 2004/10/12
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/16
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Craig Graham, 2004/10/11
Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Sigurd Vindenes, 2004/10/27