[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving
From: |
K.J. Mansley |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving |
Date: |
16 Oct 2004 14:10:20 +0100 |
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 12:31, Craig Graham wrote:
> tcp_recved() mod (Atte, threshold==TCP_WND/2) 31s 238%
Thanks for taking the time to test and profile all these!
I've committed a fix, and opted for the middle of the range (in terms of
agressiveness) TCP_WND/2 as the threshold. This can be tuned to
whatever you want if you need the extra few %.
Was a bug report filed on savannah for this problem? I couldn't see
anything to close when I checked in the fix just now.
Thanks
Kieran
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Craig Graham, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Atte Kojo, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Atte Kojo, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, K.J. Mansley, 2004/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Wei Bo-Er \(Jason\), 2004/10/12
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Craig Graham, 2004/10/12
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Atte Kojo, 2004/10/12
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Craig Graham, 2004/10/12
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving,
K.J. Mansley <=
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Craig Graham, 2004/10/11
Re: [lwip-users] TCP performance in receiving, Sigurd Vindenes, 2004/10/27