[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port
From: |
Jani Monoses |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Jan 2003 00:10:14 -0000 |
First of all I think that as more and more ports and drivers are done
it is necessary to put them in a separate package.lwip-ports or something
Since no actual improvements are done to core functionality there is no need
to include it.
As far as broken compilers go I am totally against cluterring the code with
even more ifdefs.
The goal is to make lwip clean and separable of apps and arch dependent code.
Again this is my opinion and if somebody has another view let's discuss it here.
For working on lwIP it's better to have the clean sources:faster cvs update and
download time,
relevant cscope or ctags database and grep results..
so
RFC: how about making a separate arch module in cvs where people can look for
implementation examples
or get the desired paltform code, while the lwip module sould contain only the
original unixsim?
>
> The compiler error in this case was that the expression:
>
> (u8_t *)seg->p->payload)
>
> Was actually compiled as if the following were written:
>
> (u8_t *)seg->p)
>
Have you tried explicit casts or more parantheses instead of another var?
> **Unless** TCP_OUT_DEBUG was turned on, in which case it compiled
> correctly. As you might imagine, it takes many hours to debug each
> compiler bug like this. (There are rumors that new compilers, perhaps
> better, will be available by January.) In the mean time, I have a project
> to complete...:)
Luckily your projects goal is probably about getting lwip to work and not about
getting
these workarounds in public CVS ;)
Jani.
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port, David Haas, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port, Kieran Mansley, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port, Kieran Mansley, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port, Kieran Mansley, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port, Robert, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port, Robert, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port, Kieran Mansley, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] eZ80 port,
Jani Monoses <=