[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP...
From: |
Felipe Massia Pereira |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP... |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Jan 2003 00:42:04 -0000 |
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Rod Boyce wrote:
> I still like the idea of diffrent TCP sequence numbering and memory
> allocation
> chosen by compile time irectives but we maybe need another method to access
> wildly diverging streams of code possibly under the name.
Hello all,
some different config files could be written. Like minimum-config,
secure-config, etc. Then the developer just starts her config from one of
them.
Felipe
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP..., Rod Boyce, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP..., Leon Woestenberg, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP...,
Felipe Massia Pereira <=
- [lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP..., Paul Sheer, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP..., Rod Boyce, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP..., Leon Woestenberg, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP..., Felipe Massia Pereira, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: Re: [lwip] The future of lwIP..., Paul Sheer, 2003/01/09