[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] architecture question
From: |
Peter Graf |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] architecture question |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 22:14:16 -0000 |
Hi Horst,
>Yes, I'm porting lwip to Motorola 68302 (big endian too).
Thanks. You probably have the nearest architecture to my own, which is uses
plain old 68000 code, running on >=68020. Would it be possible for you to
send me your lwipopts.h and compiler options (privately)? Thanks a lot.
>No SLIP but an interrupt driven SMCS ethernet controller 91C911.
So using SLIP might be part of my version 0.5 problems.
>I'm using to latest cvs-sources! TCP, UDP, ICMP, httpd - all works.
Great.
>I recommend using the _latest_ cvs-sources! In the past (since 0.4)
>there are some changes for big endian and checksum calculation.
I first used the >0.5 cvs-sources (same problem), but went back to the 0.5
release. I thought at least ICMP should work with that one.
>Caution with interrupt driven frame input! Avoid calling functions which
>are semaphore blocked -as netif->input()- directly from interrupt!
Yes, I already avoid this. Thanks a lot for your ideas.
Peter
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] architecture question, Peter Graf, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] architecture question,
Peter Graf <=
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] architecture question, Andy Knox, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] architecture question, Peter Graf, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] architecture question, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] architecture question, Horst Garnetzke, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] architecture question, Florian Schulze, 2003/01/09