Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating

[Kieran Mansley]

On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 11:18 +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> Anyway, both explanations are a strong case for us to change the code
> so that such an entry is re-requested before it times out. Since would
> effectively only be a test for a single counter (for every transmitted
> packet), I don't think it will hurt performance to much. Restructuring
> find_entry() to only do a quick find on TX should outweight that
> anyway.

Agreed: let's get a task for this on savannah.

Kieran