[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 07:54:11 +0200 |
"Bill Auerbach" <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm happy to test this. All of our systems send constant UDP "here I am"
> messages or TCP status messages once per second unless that information is
> folded into other outbound replies. So if there is constant communication
> would I still see the ARP timeout?
No, when trusting incoming IP packets to update the ARP table, every incoming
packet leads to resetting the corresponding entry's timeout to 0, so you should
be fine.
Simon
>
- [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating, Leon Woestenberg, 2011/06/12
- Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating, Kieran Mansley, 2011/06/12
- Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating, Simon Goldschmidt, 2011/06/12
- Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating, Leon Woestenberg, 2011/06/12
- Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating, Leon Woestenberg, 2011/06/12
- Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating, Kieran Mansley, 2011/06/13
- Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating, Bill Auerbach, 2011/06/13
- Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating, Leon Woestenberg, 2011/06/13
- Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating, Bill Auerbach, 2011/06/13
- Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating,
Simon Goldschmidt <=
- Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating, Simon Goldschmidt, 2011/06/14
- Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating, Kieran Mansley, 2011/06/14
- Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating, Simon Goldschmidt, 2011/06/14
- Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating, Kieran Mansley, 2011/06/14
- Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating, Simon Goldschmidt, 2011/06/14
- Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating, address@hidden, 2011/06/13
- Re: [lwip-devel] etharp.c updating, Leon Woestenberg, 2011/06/13