Re: [lwip-devel] Question in inet_chksum

[address@hidden]

Bill Auerbach wrote:
> Shouldn’t the* SWAP_BYTES_IN_WORD* macro in inet_chksum.c use 
> directly, or indirectly,* LWIP_PLATFORM_HTONS*? Some may have 
> implemented this with inline assembly or inlined them to a hardware 
> implementation.

You're right on that (of course only on little-endian platforms). I've 
checked it in, thanks.

Simon