[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-devel] Re: [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition
|
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
|
Subject: |
[lwip-devel] Re: [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition |
|
Date: |
Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:02:42 +0100 |
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 06:55 -0400, Rishi Khan wrote:
> You need to implement SACK. That will fix it.
I don't think so. His problem is not caused by the other side
retransmitting lots of data, but by us concatenating the whole OOSEG
queue into a single pbuf and overflowing the length field.
Kieran
- [lwip-devel] [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition, Kieran Mansley, 2009/04/03
- [lwip-devel] [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition, Wim Dumon, 2009/04/08
- [lwip-devel] [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition, Wim Dumon, 2009/04/20
- [lwip-devel] [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition, Wim Dumon, 2009/04/20
- [lwip-devel] [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition, Kieran Mansley, 2009/04/20
- [lwip-devel] [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/04/20
- [lwip-devel] Re: [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition, Wim Dumon, 2009/04/20
- Message not available
- [lwip-devel] Re: [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition, Wim Dumon, 2009/04/20
- Re: [lwip-devel] Re: [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition, Kieran Mansley, 2009/04/21