[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-devel] [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition
From: |
Wim Dumon |
Subject: |
[lwip-devel] [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Apr 2009 09:39:40 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko/2009032609 Firefox/3.0.8 GTB5 |
Follow-up Comment #6, patch #6537 (project lwip):
I encountered an issue with this patch. I observed data loss and performance
degradation when receiving data over TCP connections with large window sizes
(e.g. TCP_WND=120KBytes). My shift is set at 7 (but it could be anything
else).
This is the problem: suppose window is usually filled for about 70K, caused
by the bandwidth*delay principle. Imagine that the link works well, and at a
certain moment a single packet is dropped. The OOSEQ code queues packets, but
there is a little gap in the sequence number for the first ooseq packet. When
that gap is filled by a retransmit of the missing data, all the
out-of-sequence queued packets, amounting to 70K of data in our example, is
concatenated in one pbuf (it is called recv_data). But the tot_len field of a
pbuf is only 16bit.... The result I observe is that there is a 64K gap in the
received data stream.
Isn't the intention of this patch to allow TCP_WND to be > 64K? Any hints on
how to solve this? I have the feeling that simply changing tot_len to a u32_t
will not be sufficient. Using multiple pbufs is probably easier?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?6537>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
- [lwip-devel] [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition, Kieran Mansley, 2009/04/03
- [lwip-devel] [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition,
Wim Dumon <=
- [lwip-devel] [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition, Wim Dumon, 2009/04/20
- [lwip-devel] [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition, Wim Dumon, 2009/04/20
- [lwip-devel] [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition, Kieran Mansley, 2009/04/20
- [lwip-devel] [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/04/20
- [lwip-devel] Re: [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition, Wim Dumon, 2009/04/20
- Message not available
- [lwip-devel] Re: [patch #6537] wnd_scale TCP option addition, Wim Dumon, 2009/04/20