wrote on 28.10.2008 14:26:38:
> I think it would be even more useful if we had this defined for each
> that we provide, as that is what you're really (probably) most
> interested in. We could add for example:
> void raw_version(int *major, int *minor, int *revision);
> void netconn_version(int *major, int *minor, int *revision);
> The major, minor and revision fields would be filled in on return.
agreed. Modularity is good. Do you have a versioning
system in place for all submodules?
> If you really do just want a single version for the whole blob, that
> would be possible, but I'd be curious to know more about why.
Well I have one place where I print out the Versionnumber
of the Stack as a whole, so I would appreciate one version number for the