[lwip-devel] [task #7490] Add return value to sys_mbox_post

[Frédéric Bernon]

Follow-up Comment #1, task #7490 (project lwip):

I'm not agree, and should be done if we give a "size" parameter to
sys_mbox_new (having a same static size for conn::mbox,  conn::recvmbox, and
tcpip.c::mbox is an error). SO_RCVBUF already give a first solution to this
problem.

But in a general way, I think we should do all the sys_arch changes in the
same times (mutex, ticks...). So, I think it should be done in "post 1.3.0".
In all cases, there will be other port breakages, and we can't do all of them
in the same release.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?7490>

_______________________________________________
  Message posté via/par Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/